CASAA Vapor Update for July2017

Opportunities to Take Action!

• Post a comment on the Citizen Petition to FDA – Take Action!
• Help us send letters to HHS Secretary Tom Price – Click here for details!

________________________________________

Creeping Prohibition through Local Government Action

Unlike state legislatures, local governments are more accessible and more easily influenced by relatively smaller sums of money. For example, enacting a comprehensive anti-tobacco policy that includes restrictions on vaping can make a small town eligible for grants from state funds and federal agencies. The size of these grants might not turn any heads in your state capitol, but for a small to mid-sized city it can make a huge difference.

Another strategic advantage of advancing policy at the local level is that it is difficult to track. According to the Census Bureau, there are 89,004 local governments in the United States. Obviously, not all of these lawmakers are being lobbied by anti-tobacco groups, but not all of them need to be. The real goal is to enact policies that affect the greatest number of people (voters) and then scale the policy up to state legislation.

The march of anti-vaping legislation across the country began in 2009 with passage of an indoor vaping ban in Suffolk County, NY. That same year, vaping was folded into indoor smoking bans in New Jersey cities and counties. By the end of 2009, New Jersey became the first state to include vaping in its indoor clean air act. And now, the same tactic is being used to advance flavor bans and raise the minimum legal purchase age to 21. Most notably, municipalities in California’s Bay Area are seeing a swarm of anti-flavors ordinances.

What began as a focus on removing menthol cigarettes from the market now includes flavored vapor products. Depending on how these proposals are written, such a ban could be limited by applying only to C-stores, pharmacies, and grocery stores. Or, in the case of poorly written legislation in New York City and New Jersey, a flavor ban would prohibit ANY flavored e-liquid, including tobacco.

Some may feel that federal law does not allow states or municipalities to enact stricter tobacco regulations. But federal preemption generally applies to governments making laws that are less restrictive than federal regulations. While the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (FSPTCA) preempts governments from setting different manufacturing, labeling, and tobacco standards, it does not, for example, preempt stricter regulations regarding the sale of tobacco products by state and local governments. (Local governments are also subject to any preemption that may be established by their state, but few states preempt local governments when it comes to tobacco.) At least one town in Massachusetts has attempted to ban the sale of tobacco and nicotine products completely. Had it not been for angry townsfolk (carrying the proverbial torches and pitchforks), it would have taken a creative legal solution to overturn the decision. San Francisco’s flavor ban–recently passed by the Board of Supervisors–is also not preempted by federal or state law. In fact, the only preemption in California law related to tobacco/nicotine sales is for licensing of tobacco vending machines.

In the coming weeks and months we’ll be exploring how best to fight back and maybe even prevent local attacks on harm reduction from being successful. Organizing at the local level will be a focus of our presentation at VTA’s conference in July.

An appropriate place to get started is by monitoring your local government and events in your area.

• Often, groups promoting a local policy will host town halls or other small events to inform the community of the issue.
• Generally, local governments are required to notify stakeholders when ordinances will be heard that affect them. In the case of tobacco, cities will often send notices to businesses that are licensed as tobacco retailers. Depending on your state or local laws, this likely won’t include vape shops.
• Monitoring announcements from your city hall or ads in local publications will be helpful in alerting you to these events. Search for your local government here. (Or simply Google your city name + city council.)
• Set up a Google Alert for words like “tobacco” and “flavored tobacco” and “indoor smoking.”

When you become aware of an attack on tobacco harm reduction in your area, please share it with us (yes, we are crowd sourcing this intel because local legislative tracking services are wildly expensive).

• Send an email to [email protected] and write “Local Alert” in the subject line.
• You can also send us a message through our main Facebook page here.
• AND make sure you share the news with your friends and local vape shops.

Additional coverage:

06.20.17 – “SF Supervisors OK ban on sale of flavored tobacco” – Rachel Swan – SF GATE

06.21.17 – “San Francisco Passes One-Size-Fits-All Flavor Ban, Condemns Smokers to Status Quo” – CASAA

06.22.17 – “Tobacco pressed by local laws” – David Bennett, Convenience Store Decisions

06.22.17 – “Middletown Bans Flavored Tobacco” – Olga Enger – Newport This Week

06.23.17 – “Vernon Hills may be next to raise age to buy tobacco to 21” – Mick Zawislak – Daily Herald

06.23.17 – “MAINE SENATE PASSES MINIMUM TOBACCO PURCHASING AGE INCREASE” – Charlie Minato – Halfwheel

06.23.17 – “Tobacco 21 Bill Voted Through New Jersey Legislature” – Preventing Tobacco Addiction Foundation

________________________________________

Agricultural Appropriations Language for FY2018 Budget Bill

As most people know, for the last two years, efforts to change the predicate date have focused on the Cole-Bishop Amendment to the Agriculture Appropriations Bill. Just this week, the House Agriculture Appropriations Subcommittee approved by a voice vote the 2018 appropriations bill, and as part of the base bill (not an amendment), there is language that would effectively change the predicate date for newly deemed tobacco products (including vapor). However, the language in the bill is raising concerns and debate in the vapor community.

It is important to emphasize that we are no longer talking about the “Cole-Bishop amendment” because this language is in the base bill. And although HR 1136 remains a useful tool in gathering support for the language in the Ag Approps bill, it is a completely separate–and now different–piece of legislation. Specifically, the new language in Section 753 of the Agricultural Appropriations bill includes potentially troubling language involving “characterizing flavors,” in the context of the FDA being directed to promulgate a rule regarding standards.

The implications of adding the flavors language is still being discussed and the source of the language is still a matter of speculation. While it is tempting to simplify the inclusion of “characterizing flavors” in the Ag Approps language to mean “a ban on flavors,” it is important to remember that simple words in complicated laws rarely have straightforward interpretations.

It is also important to note that the FDA already has the authority to regulate flavored tobacco products and can promulgate a rule at any time. Of course, the standard comment period and OMB/OIRA review process still applies, but in the case of the appropriations language, the agency is being directed by Congress to issue proposed rules within 21 months of the passage of the appropriations bill.

We are still in the information-gathering and analysis stage and will be working cooperatively with other stakeholders to determine our best course of action to preserve the diversity of products that consumers rely upon.

________________________________________

State Elections 2017

New Jersey and Virginia held primary elections on June 13th. CASAA is looking for a volunteer in each state to help gather the results, monitor campaigns, and help build our database of candidates so we can send out our candidate survey.

For a preview of what the end result will look like, please see our voter guide from 2016 here.

If you are interested in volunteering, please send an email to [email protected] with the subject “CASAA Voting Guide 2017.”

As always, make sure you are Registered to Vote!

________________________________________

ICYMI – There was a Snus Convention in St. Louis!

(05.31.17) A remarkable thing happened this past weekend. The first-ever snus convention in the United States was held in St. Louis, Missouri. Down a rather nondescript hallway on the third floor of a hotel, there was a small conference room with a speaker’s dais, projection screen, and about 40 chairs. Despite its modest appearance, one couldn’t escape the feeling you were witnessing something of great importance… read more

________________________________________

06.15.17 – Kansas Legislature Sends Vapor Tax Reform Bill to the Governor

HB 2230 has passed both chambers of the Kansas Legislature with only one opposing vote. This bill changes the tax on vapor products from 20c/ml to 5c/ml.

Thanks are certainly in order for everyone that took several opportunities to contact their lawmakers and support this change. In particular, special thanks are in order for Spencer Duncan of the Kansas Vapers Association worked tirelessly to advance this legislation and bring much needed reform to the states vaping tax law.

For a timeline of events, please see the Kansas Vapers Association Facebook group here.

________________________________________

Brian Fojtik – Big Government, Public Health, and E-cigarettes (3 part series)

• Part 1 https://ricochet.com/439933/big-government-public-health-and-e-cigarettes-part-i/
• Part 2 https://ricochet.com/439935/big-government-public-health-and-e-cigarettes-part-ii/
• Part 3 https://ricochet.com/439936/big-government-public-health-e-cigarettes-part-iii/

________________________________________

American Enterprise Institute (AEI) Sensible regulation of e-cigarettes: Opportunities for reform

• https://youtu.be/ZBThHeHhqXA

________________________________________

#FDAdeeming – Comment on the Citizen Petition

A Citizen Petition has been submitted to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requesting that the agency issue “final guidance or regulations describing the recommended or required contents of premarket submissions…” In addition to requesting this final guidance, petitioners (NJOY et. al.) are requesting that the compliance period be extended by 24 months… read more and take action

________________________________________

Recent State Alerts

• California tax on tobacco (and e-cigarettes) went into effect July 1. (article)
• MA – Stop a 40% tax on vaping!
• NYC – Stop the city from closing down vape shops!
• PA – Take action to fix the vapor tax! (Updated for HB 1477)
• DE – Stop Governor Carney from Taxing Vapor Products!

________________________________________

Local Alerts

• • Minnesota – Local efforts to raise the purchase age to 21, ban indoor use, and restrict the sales of flavored products are flaring up–similar to what is happening in California. We will be keeping this table updated as details emerge. (H/t to CASAA Volunteer, Skip Murray, for monitoring local governments in MN, getting this list started, and keeping us updated).
  • Los Gatos, CA – On May 16th, the flavor ban ordinance was passed as part of the consent agenda with no opposition. While Los Gatos’ ordinance does allow for specialty retailers (those with 60% of their gross sales coming from “tobacco products”) to continue selling flavored vapor products, the most common retail environments where smokers would become aware of vaping can now only sell tobacco flavored products.
  • Contra Costa Co., CA – A hearing for a flavor ban ordinance (item D.2., Ordinance 2017-01 on the agenda) was held on Tuesday, June 13th. Video of the meeting is available here. The board moved to bring back amended versions of the flavors ordinance and a zoning ordinance on July 11th.
  • San Francisco, CA – A flavor ban has been approved by the Board of Supervisors and is heading to a final vote on Tuesday, June 27th. Click here for our Call to Action!
  • Yellowstone County, MT – The county’s department of health, Riverstone Health, will hold a public hearing about a proposed indoor vaping ban (Rule #7). This ban covers all public indoor spaces and workplaces including vapor shops. Click here for our Alert.

July2017 Vapor Calls To Action

The most vital 2017 Vapor Call to Action for your state or local area is asking for HR1136 support. Unite to fight for our right to VAPE! Write, call or both to your lawmakers :

congress.gov/members: Contact your state representatives in Congress

House Reps by State:  Contact your state representatives in the Senate

HR1136 in PDF

VSLLC /VapersArmy update this page daily.

We research  for CTA (Calls to Action) in the morning. On occasion, a #2017VapeFight .org may publish a CTA later in the day. It may pass us till the next day. Help this page—> ON IG, we have received several CTA Alerts in the past from concerned Vapers (#VapeWarriors). We appreciate this and please continue or join in this practice. We will publish your handle when you tag us for the alert. Thank you VapersArmy!

 Although, most of these CTA do not pertain directly to VapeSling® products, it does affect our #VapeCommunity. The Community is family…being part of a family means doing your part. Please do yours brothers and sisters for Vaping as Harm reduction.

 Posted – 07.13.17

PA – Take action to fix the vapor tax!

 Posted – 07.08.17

DE – Help stop new taxes on vaping and higher taxes on smokeless tobacco!

 Posted – 07.07.17 Alerted by @afcarmona

FDA – Comment NOW on proposed–unrealistic–standard for smokeless tobacco

Posted – 07.05.17

Opportunities to Take Action!

• Post a comment on the Citizen Petition to FDA – Take Action!

• Help us send letters to HHS Secretary Tom Price – Click here for details!

Posted – 06.22.17

San Francisco, CA – Stop the Flavor Ban!

LOUDLY OPPOSE THE 

SAN FRANCISCO FLAVOR BAN!

Click Here to Take Action!

Posted 6/9/17

MT – Yellowstone County public hearing on indoor vaping ban

Posted 6/2/17

• PA – Help us change the vapor tax and bring vape shops back to Pennsylvania!

• DE – Stop Governor Carney from taxing vapor products!

Posted 5/26/17

Delay the FDA – Comment on the Citizen Petition today!

A Citizen Petition has been submitted to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requesting that the agency issue “final guidance or regulations describing the recommended or required contents of premarket submissions…” In addition to requesting this final guidance, petitioners (NJOY et. al.) are requesting that the compliance period be extended by 24 months from the time the guidance is published. …

Delay the FDA – Comment on the Citizen Petition today!

Posted 5/22/17

• San Francisco, CA – Stop the Flavor Ban!

Posted 5/15/17

• LA – Fight back against raising taxes on e-liquid!

Posted 5/11/17

• NY – Help us stop two bills that would restrict access to and use of vapor products!

  Posted 5/9/17

• MD – VETO HB 523, burdensome licensing and partial online sales ban

• NYC – Stop the city from closing down vape shops!

• PA – Take action to fix the vapor tax!

• AK – Take action to oppose an indoor vaping ban (SB 63)

• OR – Help defeat Tobacco and Vapor 21!

Posted 4/21/17

OR – Help defeat Tobacco and Vapor 21!

Posted 4/16/17

HR 1136 gains early co-sponsors. Take a moment to say THANK YOU!

2 weeks ago

Keep Cole-Bishop in the 2017 US Budget!

2 weeks ago

UcanQuit2’s Smoking

Posted 4/12/17

Fire The U.S. Surgeon General. Unacceptable Anti-Vapor Propaganda Video

Urge your representative to co-sponsor HR 1136! Click Here

NEW congressional BILL: H.R.1136 – To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to provide for a certain effective date with respect to deemed tobacco products, to provide for the establishment of product standards for vapor product batteries, to provide for regulation of vapor products, and for other purposes.

Write or call to Ask your state lawmakers to support this bill

Cole/Bishop bill in it’s entirety

Older but current posts

Posted Jan 4th

The new year is here, but responses to ECigIntelligence’s consumer survey are still needed.

Your participation in this survey will help inform regulators, advocates, and commentators as we all work to build policies that benefit consumers.

If you haven’t already, please take a moment (5 – 10 minutes) to complete the survey.

Click here to take the survey

Thank you!

Alex Clark

CASAA Legislative Coordinator

Posted Jan 4th

2017 State Taxes affecting vapers throughout the country

Posted Dec 8th

Posted Nov 7

Lookup your LawMakers before your vote

FIVE THINGS TO DO TODAY TO SAVE VAPING

(1)  Send a Message! Support a change to the 2007 “predicate date” which could save the vapor industry from total destruction.

• Send an Email

(2)  Join CASAA! It’s easy, it’s free, and we will keep you up to date on information and opportunities to take action to protect your access to vapor products.

• Click to Join CASAA
• Follow CASAA on Facebook

(3)  Register To Vote! Millions of vapers, including YOU, have the power to influence government decisions by electing candidates who support vaping!

• Click to Register to Vote

(4)  Tell your story! Visit CASAA’s Testimonials Project and tell us about your experience with low-risk, smoke-free products like e-cigarettes and snus.

• Click to Submit Your Story

(5)  Support CASAA’s work to promote tobacco harm reduction policies and keep the diverse range of smoke-free alternatives available.

Answer Ron Johnson

August 17, 2016 Comments Offon Answer Ron Johnson

  (Please note: if you live outside of Wisconsin, please follow the directions below to print and send your letter.) Senator Ron Johnson (WI) is taking the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to task over the impact of the “deeming rule” on small to medium vapor businesses across the country. Sen. Johnson, Chair of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental …

Read More »

FROM THE TRENCHES: VTA UPDATE July2017

Happy Independence Day!

THE FEDERAL FRONT

NEW HO– USE APPROPRIATIONS BILL FILED

This week, the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies marked up its FY 2018 Subcommittee bill (“Agriculture Appropriations”) giving FDA $2.8 billion in discretionary funding.  Last year, we had to fight to get a change to the predicate date amended into the House Agriculture appropriations bill.  This year, the Committee has included the predicate date change in the base bill.  This is a significant development since our industry will not have to wage a fight to include it again.

In addition to including what we previously referred to as the Cole-Bishop amendment language, the new bill also includes a provision attempting to deal with a very real and serious concern in Congress about flavors, how they are being used by industry, and their perceived impact on youth.  Specifically, the language would require FDA to engage in a rulemaking process pursuant to Section 907 of the Tobacco Control Act to address “characterizing flavors.”

The notion of flavors being addressed is understandably concerning to many.  To be sure, it is of great concern to VTA which is proud to have on its Board and in its membership the largest flavor companies, e-liquid manufacturers and e-liquid distributors in the United States, as well as hundreds of vape shops. However, as with anything else, it is important to understand the complete picture before reacting.  To that end, our federal team and Board dug in to determine what transpired and have begun to analyze what this might mean for the industry.  There is more to be considered, but here are some initial thoughts.

The issue is real. There is no question that both Republican and Democratic members have serious concerns about this issue.  Not only was it was raised at the confirmation hearing of Commissioner Gottlieb, but this new language was inserted by GOP members who controlled the drafting process.  It is important for our industry to realize that we must address this issue or risk alienating even our most ardent supporters.

What the language means.  The language does not “ban” flavors, it does not require FDA to ban flavors nor, for that matter, even consider banning flavors.  If passed, the language would require FDA to start a rulemaking process on “characterizing flavors” within 21 months of the effective date of the Act and to complete the process within 36 months.  Since the bill likely wouldn’t pass or be signed until January 1, 2018 – or thereafter – that means FDA would have to initiate its rulemaking process by September 2019 and somehow complete that rulemaking process by January 1, 2021.

What we know about the rulemaking process.  Rulemaking is slow. Notwithstanding the fact that the bill, if passed, would require FDA to complete its work within three years, that is a very aggressive timeframe for notice and comment rulemaking.  It is highly unlikely that FDA would be able to complete its work in that period of time.

The good news?  Congress has the power to ban flavors – just as it did with respect to tobacco cigarettes – for the vapor industry.  In this bill, not only is Congress essentially ceding its authority to the FDA, it asks FDA to focus only on “characterizing flavors.”  Also, unlike Congress, FDA must establish a scientific basis for any product standard it publishes on characterizing flavors.  In fact, the bill expressly requires FDA to issue a notice of proposed rulemaking, ensuring the lengthy notice and comment process.

Shoe on the Other Foot?  Much like manufacturers, which are now being required to prove the positive individual and public health benefit of vapor products to satisfy the onerous PMTA requirements, in order for FDA to implement a regulation on characterizing flavors FDA must establish scientific evidence that addresses the “risks and benefits to the population as a whole, including users and nonusers of tobacco products, of the proposed standard” among other things.  Doing so will be extremely difficult for FDA for a number of reasons, including the fact that the language is focused on “characterizing flavors.”  As a point of reference, despite a significant body of scientific and survey data, over the past 8 years FDA was unable to establish a justification for banning the #1 flavor in the world to date – menthol.

Keeping all of this perspective in mind, VTA already is working on a solution that that will address the issues of greatest concern.  We are evaluating options and determining how best to proceed to defend our industry.  That said, our industry must have a serious conversation about how we are going to address this issue.

To that end, we are inviting you to join us in Washington, D.C. on July 18-19 for Vape & the FDA 2.  There we will convene an all-star panel on flavors that will explain what “characterizing flavors” means, what the Agriculture Appropriations bill does, were it to be enacted as filed, how FDA would be required to address flavors, and how our industry can move forward in a responsible way to defend this vital part of our industry.

You want to be part of this conversation!

You need to be part of this conversation!

VAPE & THE FDA 2 INDUSTRY CONFERENCE!

Surviving & Thriving in 
A New Regime for Vapor

One year post-Deeming.

A new Administration is engaged.

Deadlines are moving.

Congress is filing new bills.

What does it all mean?

Where is it all headed?

VTA’s Board of Directors, which has unparalled experience operating in a heavily regulated world, knows the information that you need and is putting together another industry conference that will address the biggest and most pressing issues facing our industry.

So, whether you are an e-liquid or device manufacturer, vape shop owner, supplier, distributor, or importer, this is a conference you must attend!

REGISTER NOW!

The room block is filling up fast!

JULY 17, 2017 – PRE-MEETING ACTIVITIES

8:00 a.m. –  Registration and Hot Breakfast
9:00 a.m. – Plenary Session Kicks Off
12:00 p.m. – Luncheon with Noted Speaker(s)
1:30 p.m. – Dual Manufacturer & Retailer Tracks
6:00 p.m. –  Networking Reception in Lincoln Library

Location: Trump International Hotel
1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C.

JULY 19, 2017 – DAY ON CAPITOL HILL 
with West Front Strategies

8:00 a.m. – Advocate Round Up & Assignment of Hill Teams
9:00 a.m. – Advocate Send Off
9:30 – 4:00 p.m. – Meetings on Capitol Hill

Last year’s Vape & the FDA Conference was great success, attended by 200 industry professionals representing 67 companies from 26 states and 4 countries.

Check out this one-minute video to get a glimpse.

Don’t miss out this year! Register now by using VTA’s Conference Registration Portal where you can also access the hotel reservation information and the group room rate.

Our government affairs team will set up meetings with your Congressmen and Senators.  All you have to do is register!

Please forward this invitation to anyone you think may be interested in attending!

Shortly we will be publishing a detailed agenda of the numerous timely topics that will be covered.

GET ON THE MAP!

In order to stand up and continue to push for regulatory changes at the federal level, and work to stop anti-vapor policies at the state level, VTA has created an interactive Vape Company Map Initiative to show regulators just who we are.  This is being shared with White House, your members of Congress, and state legislative leaders to show them that vapor is in “every corner of every state”!  Are you on the Map?  If not, stand up and be counted today!  This will take you less than 5 minutes  – sign up now! 

THE STATE OF THE STATES

Despite the fact that the legislative session has ended in several states, there are several local ordinances and rulemakings occurring in states which will not only affect your vapor business in the short-term, but will also set the stage for state legislative fights next session.  There are a number of issues which we need vapor businesses to get involved in. We must get organized and fight back.

Moving Mountains: Pennsylvania Vape Association & VTA Move Tax Repeal Bill Out of Committee
This year the Pennsylvania Vape Association stepped forward and put together a strong team to repeal the small business killing 40% wholesale tax.  House Bill 1477 eliminates the onerous 40% wholesale tax on vapor products and replaces it with a per milliliter tax. This week, the bill passed out of the House Finance Committee on strong 19-5 vote.

PVA Board Member Amelia Rivera and VTA State Affairs Manager Jake Butcher testified before the House Finance Committee on June 27, 2017.

There was much debate in the House Finance Committee over the amount of revenue which should be expected from the Pennsylvania vapor tax. The Department of Revenue estimated that the tax could bring in approximately $23 million to the State of Pennsylvania. House Finance Committee members were prepared to push back hard, questioning the Department’s numbers stating that the average collections would only produce closer to $15.5 million in revenue annually.  To place this projection in perspective, the current bill’s $0.05 (5 cent per ml) tax would generate approximately $9 million dollars annually while a $0.075 (7.5 cent per ml) tax would generate approximately $14 million dollars annually. The budget committees have told the PVA that any proposal must be revenue neutral to be considered.

PVA and its lobbyists are moving mountains and changning the entire discussion in Harrisburg this session.  The fact that a change of this nature is still in play, given the state’s budget crisis, is a true testament to the Kinser Group’s efforts.  Right now, they are working to ensure that the key decision makers keep the vapor tax change on the list of priorities.

PVA & VTA will keep you updated in the coming days as we continue to work to ensure that the final budget discussions repeal the 40% tax.  Thanks to all those who have worked to repeal this devastating tax policy. The Pennsylvania legislature will return after the July 4th Holiday.

Another One Bites the Dust: Ohio Vapor Trade Association Kills 69% Wholesale Tax
Governor John Kasich (R-Ohio) proposed a 69% wholesale tax on vapor products this session as part of a broader package to address state revenue needs. The Ohio Vapor Trade Association took it head on and spent over five months meeting with legislators to provide information on the impact of tax policies implemented in other states, the latest research on vapor products, as well as providing testimony to House and Senate Finance committees on the specific impacts a vapor tax would have on Ohio vapor businesses and consumers.

Picture of perfect collaboration.  VTA worked hand-in-hand with Ohio Vapor Trade Association and its lobbyist,providing insights and guidance, drafting testimony, travling to Ohio to testify in Committee on national trends, current health related studies on vapor, as well as the federal regulations affecting the vapor industry.  VTA also initiated multipel calls to action and collaborated with CASAA so that the powerful the message from consumers also reached the Ohio legislators.  Thanks to all who worked so hard to defeat this regressive tax policy. And a special congratulations to OHVTA President James Jarvis, who showed remarkable leadership in his first year, the entire OHVTA Board and team which has been dogged in their defense of vapor, and, Charlotte Hickcox, of ZHF Consulting, who provided steady, sound and smart guidance on the ground in Columbus.

Local Flavor Bans Decimate Vapor Businesses
Local flavor bans on tobacco products including vapor products have been proposed and are being acted on at the local level. This week the San Francisco City Council passed a ban on flavored tobacco products. Not Blowing Smoke spearheaded an aggressive campaign with CASAA challenging the local ordinance and should be congratulated for their efforts. VTA, the California Smoke Free Organization and as well as other advocates sent multiple calls to action to raise awareness and objection to ordinance.

If unchanged, this irresponsible and dangerous ban will mean that San Francisco small businesses will close and consumers will have limited access to flavored e-liquids.  This action highlights the need to be vigilant and active at the local level, even though a majority of state legislatures are not in session.  Education of state legislators and local officials is a year-round process. Meeting legislators in vapor shops when they are out of session is the best way to educate them on your businesses and the services you provide to their constituents. There have already been flavor bans introduced in New Jersey and New York at the state level! We must organize and be ready to act!

Utah to Begin Early Implementation of Deeming: Labeling Requirements to Change on July 1, 2017
The Utah Department of Public Health has indicated to the Utah Smoke Free Association that they will essentially begin early implementation of FDA deeming rules regarding labeling effective July 1, 2017.

The Utah Smoke Free Association is working to educate the Department of Public Health onthe effects of this decision. The rule requires that a label follow the same safety standards as the required by the FDA, and that the safety warning take up 30% of the container’s display panel. Click here to read the full rule. Join the Utah Smoke Free Association today by contacting Tad Jensen at [email protected] to fight back.

California E-Cigarette Tax Increase In Effect as of July 1, 2017
The implementation of Proposition 56 will continue in California this week. As of April 1, 2017, distributors began remitting 27.30 percent of wholesale cost of nicotine delivery devices, including e-liquids. As of July 1, 2017, the tax rate on tobacco products, including electronic cigarettes and other nicotine delivery devices sold in combination with nicotine, will increase at a rate equivalent to the increase on cigarettes.

The California Smoke Free Organization is still working with the Board of Equalization to limit the adverse impact of the tax on various fronts.  For example, CSFO is ensuring that devices sold “in combination with” e-liquids are not taxed. To bring everyone up to date on what CSFO has done and is doing to address these issues, on July 11, 2017, CSFO will be hosting a webinar to discuss these issues. More information will be available after the July 4th holiday.

Iowa Sales Tax on Online Sales Effective July 1, 2017
A law which legalized online sales within Iowa goes into effect on July 1, 2017. SF 516 requires that online sellers remit sales tax beginning July 1, 2017. It is important to note that all online retailers who sell to consumers in Iowa must be licensed, and further must be bonded. SF 516 also requires age verification at the point of sale, as well as signature of a person at least 18 years of age upon delivery. Click here to learn more information about the licensure and remitting sales tax.

Kansas Vapor Taxes Cut by 75%
The Kansas Vapor Association scored a huge victory last week when Governor Sam Brownback signed HB 2230 last week lowering the tax on e-liquids to from $0.20 per milliliter to $.05 per milliliter. This legislation is another a monumental step in educating legislators on the differences between combustible tobacco and vapor products. This legislation also continues the broader trend of state legislative bodies rejecting vapor tax increases and seeking to lower already implemented vapor tax policies. Congratulations to the Spencer Duncan and the Kansas Vapor Association for your remarkable leadership on this issue!

State of New York Adds Vapor Products to Clean Indoor Air Act
The State of New York, which had rejected adding vapor to clean air bills for the past three years unfortunately, passed an expansion of the New York Clean Indoor Air Act this week that would add vapor products to the Act.  The law will prohibit vaping in any space in which smoking is currently prohibited, lumps vapor with smoking and unfortunately cites the effects of second hand vapor, treating vapor products for all practical purposes in the same manner as combustible cigarettes.

As anti-vaping groups celebrated, the only silver-lining is that the law carves out vapor shops that generate at least 75% of their revenue from vapor products.  Thank you to all those who worked so hard to defeat this legislation including CASAA, the New York State Vapor Association, and the many VTA members in New York. VTA will continue to work to educate NY legislators and work to repeal these damaging policies. Read VTA’s memo in opposition to the legislation.

NOW IS THE TIME TO JOIN VTA!

As you can see from the foregoing, VTA is set up for success.  We have an outstanding Board of Directors comprised of vapor manufacturers and retailers who have deep FDA and industry experience, we have a bi-partisan team of five lobbyists (known as the vapor lobbyists) on Capitol Hill, we have a bi-partisan public affairs team who are expert at messaging, and we have a State Affairs Manager (also a state lobbist/lawyer) who is in constant touch with state vapor leaders and their lobbyists.

Our members get access to these professionals and lots of meaningful guidance on all the federal and state regulatory and strategic issues affecting our industry.  And, if ever you want to get me on the phone, here’s the number: 312-498-6060.

In short, if you like what you read in this update and if you want to be a part of securing our industry’s future, then join us and the hundreds of other companies we are proud to call VTA Members today!  All you need to do is fill out this VTA Membership Application and return it to us.

To learn more, check us out at www.vaportechnology.org  and www.SaveVapor.org. And, don’t forget to follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

Finally, have a safe Fourth of July weekend and thank you for all you do to defend vapor!

Tony Abboud
Executive Director
Vapor Technology Association